Home » EU Policy Recommendations – Introduction » Chapter VI. EU policy recommendations on self-care

Chapter VI. EU policy recommendations on self-care

This chapter aims to pull together the principal conclusions from the above four sections : 1. review of existing EU policy, 2. needs of persons/patients, 3. socio-medical environment around the persons’/patients’ needs, 4. impact of self-care systems on the EU health systems and the relevant policy implications of the work within WP1 (guideline on how to promote self-care within the EU) and WP2 (guideline to help member States and stakeholders to develop and produce communication tools on self-care). In addition it aims to include the gender dimension, socioeconomic circumstances related to access to healthcare and health inequalities, including in relation to (un)documented migrants and disability.

The EU policy recommendations that result from the 4 main sections, above are:

  • General recommendations on self-care for minor physical health conditions


  1. Linkages with existing EU policies would need to be fine-tuned to ensure coherence, increase predictability and limit unintended effects that each separate policy may have on the other.

     EU policy on self-care should be well integrated with existing policies, have a clear long-term strategy and be communicated across policy sectors (from health to social, regional development (cohesion policy), education, research, employment and economic policies).

Self-care policy should be formulated and implemented together with and not against other policies. Promotion of self-care in all policies should take into account the social gradient and not exacerbate health inequalities. The special needs of citizens who are institutionally hard to reach should be specifically addressed in any such initiative. The impact on existing pieces of legislation or potential links should be considered.


  1. Self-care should also be defined from a policy perspective to clarify the role of related policies that contribute to it: health literacy, patient empowerment, access to healthcare, self-medication, self-management, patient safety and long-term care. There is an urgent need to tackle all pre-conditions to achieve self-care successfully as tackling for example only health literacy and not patient empowerment, would be insufficient.


  1. Specifically, time and time again the need for greater health literacy as a cornerstone of successfully implemented self-care policies is pointed up. Although there have been some valuable recent research studies addressing this topic, the need for a coherent Europe-wide initiative to increase levels of health literacy is evident.
  2. Useful concepts explained in Chapter II, such as ‘productive interactions’ and participative learning may be transferred from existing models such as the chronic into a future self-care model for minor ailments.


  1. National guidelines for the 5 minor ailments developed within WP1 should be promoted at EU level and included within the future self-care policy as effective implementation tools.


  1. The website developed within WP2 could be used as a digital self-care platform at EU level.



  1. EU policy on self-care should encourage (/allocate funding for) small pilot projects taking into account social and cultural variations and social structures in both urban and rural areas to pre-test and validate necessary interventions to promote self-care. Self-care should not lead to disempowering of care communities and should not be an excuse for insufficient access to healthcare in rural areas.


  1. There is a need to create a repository of best practices on training of healthcare professionals as well as self-care interventions. There are clear recommendations from previous policy briefs that education of health professionals in communication and specific skills related to promoting self-care need to become part of the professional curriculum but also be routinely assessed as part of the quality criteria by which the performance of professionals and the health system is assessed.


9.Employment practices may include the provision of well-being programmes, thus contributing to reduced loss of income through sickness and improved citizen awareness of the need for self-care. The added-value of such schemes needs to be evaluated and should be integrated into consideration of future policy on self-care. On the other hand, the requirement to always present a medical certificate when on sick leave, where this exists (self-certification for short periods exists in some MS) represents a barrier going against self-care principles and discouraging self-care. These matters are worthy of investigation as they represent influences external to the healthcare system that impact on this issue.



  1. The cost benefit analysis carried out as a precursor to this study demonstrates the major problem that there is insufficient data currently available to allow more sophisticated analysis of the true impact of self-care on health systems from an economic point of view.

That report makes various recommendations as to further research which needs to be done to remedy this.


Specific recommendations on the 5 minor conditions:


  1. Athlete’s foot
  2. Cold
  3. Cough
  4. Heartburn (without indigestion)
  5. Lower urinary tract infection

The specific recommendations on the 5 selected minor conditions will follow.




  1. David Byrne. Enabling Good Health For All: A reflection process for a new EU health strategy, European Commission, 2004.
  2. Marcel Canoy, Frédéric Lerais, Erik Schokkaert, Applying the capability approach to policy-making: The impact assessment of the EU-proposal on organ donation, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Volume 39, Issue 3, June 2010, Pages 391-399, ISSN 1053-5357, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.002.
  3. European Commission. Communication from the Commission on effective, accessible and resilient health systems. European Commission, 2014.
  4. European Commission Directorate-General for Communication. The EU explained: Public health. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013.
  5. European Commission. Conference report Health in Europe – Making it fairer 18 March 2014, Brussels. European Commission, 2014.
  6. European Commission. Background note Health in Europe – Making it fairer 18 March 2014, Brussels. European Commission, 2014.
  7. European Commission. Roma Health Report Health status of the Roma population Data collection in the Member States of the European Union. European Union, 2014.
  8. European Commission. EUROPEAN PATIENTS’ RIGHTS DAY: 10 benefits the EU brings to patients. European Commission.
  9. European Commission DG SANTE. Healthy diets pilot project for pregnant and lactating women, Literature review and best practices. European Commission, 2015.
  10. COI for the Department of Health (UK). Tackling Health Inequalities: 10 Years On – A review of developments in tackling health inequalities in England over the last 10 years. London: DH Publications Orderline, 2009.
  11. Council of the European Union. Council Conclusions on Common values and principles in European Union Health Systems. Official Journal of the European Union, 2006.
  12. Council of the European Union. Press Release 2837th Council meeting Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs. Council of the European Union, 2007.
  13. Council of the European Union. Council Conclusions on the Implementation of the EU Health Strategy – Outcome of proceedings. General Secretariat, Council of the European Union,2008.
  14. Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on innovation for the benefit of patients Employment, Social policy, Health and Consumer affairs Council meeting Brussels, 1 December 2014. Council of the European Union, 2014.
  15. Council of the European Union. Outcome of the Council Meeting Employment, Social policy, Health and Consumer affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 1 December 2014. Council of the European Union, 2014.
  16. Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on patient safety and quality of care, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial resistance Employment, Social policy, Health and Consumer affairs Council meeting Brussels, 1 December 2014. Council of the European Union, 2014.
  17. TNS Qual+ at the request of the European Commission, Directorate-General for health and Consumers. Eurobarometer Qualitative Study PATIENT INVOLVEMENT Aggregate Report May 2012. European Commission, 2012.
  18. European Commission. The Commission’s Second Report to the Council on the implementation of Council Recommendation 2009/C 151/01 on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections. European Commission, 2014.
  19. EU Fundamental Rights Agency. Presentation FRA’s work on Roma health DG Sanco Experts’ meeting on Health Inequalities. EU Fundamental Rights Agency.
  20. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Joint Report on Health Systems prepared by the European Commission and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG). European Commission, 2010.
  21. David McDaid, Adam Oliver, Sherry Merkur. Policy Summary 15 What do we know about the strengths and weakness of different policy mechanisms to influence health behaviour in the population? The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2014.
  22. Herwig Ostermann, Anna-Theresa Renner, Julia Bobek, Peter Schneider, Sabine Vogler (Gesundheit Österreich Forschungs- und Planungs GmbH). A cost/benefit analysis of selfcare systems in the European Union Final report. European Commission, 2014.